There
was a time when in the years following the financial crisis, every
Friday the FDIC would report of one or more small and not small banks
failing, as their liabilities exceeded their assets, who were taken over
by larger peers with a taxpayer subsidy to cover the capital shortfall.
And while this weekly event, also known as "FDIC Failure Friday" has
faded from the US, for now, it has made a grand appearance in China.
China’s financial regulators said on Friday the country’s banking and
insurance regulator and the central bank, will take control of the
small, troubled inner Mongolia-based Baoshang Bank due
to the serious credit risks it poses. The regulator’s control of
Baoshang will last for a year starting on Friday, the People’s Bank of
China (PBOC) and China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission
(CBIRC) said on their websites.
China Construction Bank (CCB) will be entrusted to handle the
business operations of the small lender, based in the industrial city of
Baotou, the statement said.
内モンゴルの小規模貸し手に対しては中国建設銀行が救済する、とその声明に書かれている。
Such a takeover by national authorities is extremely rare, and takes
place amid gathering concerns among regulators and financial analysts
about a renewed surge in bad debts...
... a record pace of corporate defaults,
amounting to 39.2 billion yuan of domestic bond defaults in the first
four months of the year, 3.4 times the total for the same period of
2018...
Moody's analyst Yulia Wan told the WSJ that regulators likely decided
to take over Baoshang to limit any fallout to businesses in Inner
Mongolia. “The move is to reduce the risk of a shock to the local
economy,” said said, adding that the Baoshang takeover appeared
to be the first time that national authorities seized control of a bank
since Chinese lenders started listing on stock markets in the 1990s.
In the past when banks came under pressure, local authorities would
pull together funds from local state-owned firms and investors, or have
another bank stage a takeover.
As Reuters adds, this extremely rare takeover - the
first in nearly three decades - comes at a time when the PBOC has
aggressively eased financial standards and cut reserve ratios for
smaller banks to avoid just this outcome, and highlights the
long struggle of some smaller regional lenders in China, which suffer
from deteriorating asset qualities, inadequate capital buffers, and poor
internal controls and corporate governance
Baoshang Bank rose to prominence after its key stakeholder Tomorrow
Holdings was targeted in a government crackdown on systemic risks posed
by financial conglomerates. The bank was also linked to financier Xiao
Jianhua, according to the WSJ.
Xiao left Hong Kong and crossed the border into mainland China in early
2017, according to statements from Hong Kong police and his company,
and he hasn’t been heard from since.
Later that year, Baoshang "unexpectedly" reported a capital shortage.
この年の遅く、Baoshangは「突然」資金不足を開示した。
Chinese ratings agency Dagong Global Credit Rating Co. then revised its
outlook on Baoshang to negative, questioning the lender’s ability to
repay borrowings. They were right.
中国の格付会社 Dagong Global Credit Rating Coはその時 Baoshanの見通しをネガティブに格下げした、借金返済に際しての貸し手能力に疑念が持たれたのだ。
彼らの判断は正しかった。
Understandably, there is concern the Baosheng takeover "will add to
the vulnerability of country’s financial system amid the economic
slowdown." The reason: if one bank can fail, all can fail. And how long
before depositors jog, run or sprint to their own bank to yank whatever
deposits they have there, in the process beginning the terrifying bank
run domino sequence of events, that eventually collapses China's $40
trillion banking system (by comparison, the US banking system is about
$20 trillion).
While it has been generally described as a "small" bank, Baoshang
had a total of 156.5 billion yuan ($22.68 billion) of outstanding loans
by the end of 2016, a 65% jump from the end of 2014, according
to the bank’s last filing on its assets and liabilities on its website.
What is absolutely bizarre, however, is that the bank's "official" non-performing loan ratio then was only 1.68% as of December 2016. That,
in itself, would never have been sufficient to force a takeover, and
suggests that not only was the bank's real bad debt ratio much higher,
but that China continues to chronically under-represent the true state
of its NPLs to avoid bank runs.
The last time Baoshang disclosed financial data was in the third
quarter of 2017. Then it had 576 billion yuan in assets and 543 billion
yuan in liabilities, with a net profit of 3.2 billion yuan. Based on
those 2017 numbers, analyst Long Chen with consulting firm Gavekal
Dragonomics estimated that Baoshang back then was ranked around the 50th largest bank in the nation. Baoshangが最後に金融データを開示したのは2017Q3だ。このとき資産が576B人民元で、債務は543B人民元だった、またネット利益は3.2B人民元だった。これらの2017年の数値からすると、Gavekal Dragonomicsコンサルティング会社のアナリストLong Chenの見積もりでは、当時Baoshangは50番目に大きな銀行だった。
Naturally, to avoid a panic bank run among other smaller, less
capitalized banks, the CBIRC said that principal and interest on
personal saving accounts in the bank will be fully guaranteed, and the
business operations of Baoshang bank will not be affected by the
takeover.
The takeover of the bank is the first in decades, and takes place
amid China’s crackdown on systemic financial risks, which in February
2018 resulted in the take over of former roll-up giant and conglomerate
Anbang Insurance, which in 2015-2016 made eyebrow-raising investments in
overseas property, including the Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York.
Anbang’s chairman, Wu Xiaohui, was sentenced to 18 years in prison later
that year after being convicted of fraud and abuse of power. Wu
expressed remorse, according to the court that sentenced him, but he
also said he doubted he violated any laws. He hasn’t made a public
statement since.
The question now is whether bank investors, having seen first hand
for the first time in nearly 30 years, that a Chinese bank can fail (and
be taken over by the state), will jog at a leisurely pace, or not so
leisurely, to their own local bank and pull out their deposits in a
cool, calm and collected manner... or not so cool, calm and collected.
If so, the trade with between the US and China will have a clear winner
in the very near future.
Amazonで買物をしてContrarianJを応援しよう Silver Outperforming Gold 2 Adam Hamilton July 26, 2019 3232 Words Silver has blasted higher in the last couple weeks, far outperforming gold. This is certainly noteworthy, as silver has stunk up the precious-metals joint for years. This deeply-out-of-favor metal may be embarking on a sea-change sentiment shift, finally returning to amplifying gold’s upside. Silver is not only radically undervalued relative to gold, but investors are aggressively buying. Silver’s upside potential is massive. ここ2週シルバーは急騰した、ゴールドを遥かに凌ぐものだ。これは注目すべきことだ、もう何年もシルバーはひどいものだった。この極端に嫌われた金属が大きく心理を買えている、とうとうゴールド上昇を増幅するに至った。シルバーは対ゴールドで極端に過小評価されているだけでなく、投資家は積極的に買い進んでいる。シルバーの潜在上昇力は巨大なものだ。 Silver’s performance in recent years has been brutally bad, repelling all but the most fanatical contrarians. Historically silver prices have been mostly ...
Amazonで買物をしてContrarianJを応援しよう Junk Bond Bubble In Pictures: Deflation Up Next by Tyler Durden Fri, 07/19/2019 - 14:37 Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk, The widely discussed "everything bubble" is, in reality, a corporate junk bond bubble on steroids sponsored by the Fed ... 幅広く議論されている「everything bubble」は実際に企業ジャンク・ボンドバブルにも言えることであり、これはFEDによりドーピング注入されている・・・ The highest grade AAA corporate bonds yield 2.75%. BBB-rated corporate bonds, just one step above junk, 3.5%. BB-rated bonds yield just 4.28%. 最高級ランクAAA企業債権の金利は2.75%だ。あとひとランク悪化でジャンク・ボンド入りするBBB債権金利は3.5%。BB格付け債権の金利でもわずか4.28%でしかない。 Corporate Bond Spreads 企業債権金利のスプレッド The spread between Prime AAA bonds and lower-medium grade bonds (see chart below) is just 0.77 percentage points. 最上位AAA債権と低中ランク債権のスプレッドがわずか0.77%しかない。 The spre...
Gold Stocks Surge Higher Adam Hamilton February 22, 2019 2932 Words The gold miners’ stocks surged strongly this week, blasting to new upleg highs. The mounting gains are naturally driving more interest in this small contrarian sector, shifting sentiment towards bullish. Despite their accelerating rally, gold stocks still remain fairly low technically and deeply undervalued relative to gold. So their strengthening upleg likely has plenty of room to run considerably higher in coming months. 今週金鉱株は力強く上昇し新高値となった。上昇が積み上がりこの小さなコントラリアンセクターはさらに注目を集めている、これが心理を強気なものにする。ラリーが加速するが、金鉱株はテクニカル的にはまだ安値で、対ゴールドでとても過小評価されている。というわけで力強い上昇は今後数ヶ月まだかなりな上昇余地がある。 The gold miners’ stocks are ultimately leveraged plays on gold, which overwhelmingly drives their profits. The much-maligned yellow metal has enjoyed a strong upleg since mid-August, when record gold-futures s...
一定のエネルギーが外部から流入する系ではその流入量が普遍一定でも、散逸構造、自己組織化をすることが知られています。散逸構造では空間時間的な周期構造が生じます。たとえば隔離された無人島にうさぎときつねを放した場合、時間とともに均衡値に近づきますが、完全な定常状態にはならずその前後で周期的な変動が起きます、うさぎを捕食しすぎてが減るとキツネの食料が減りキツネの個体数上昇には限界が生じ、その後うさぎの個体数が増えます。うさぎの数もその島の植物総量に限界があります。 株式市場にも30年前後のバリュエーション変動があります。管理人はこの原因はたぶん投資家の世代交代に起因するものだと感じています。多くの人の投資寿命は30年前後です。私を含めて現在投資をしている人は英國や日本で政府債務解消のための金融抑圧など記憶にもないでしょう、学校の歴史でも教えてくれません。あの米国でも金本位制のなかで国民からゴールドを強制買い上げし、ゴールド価格を改定したり個人がゴールド保有を長年禁止していたことを多くの人は知らないでしょう。少なくとも私は学校の歴史で習った覚えがありません。 また大統領任期に関連した8年前後の変動があります、政党は政権を維持するために選挙に向けて財政刺激策を行いますが選挙後にはこれが息切れします。大統領選挙前数ヶ月の株価動向と選挙結果、民主共和転換、の相関は90%を超えています。トランプのときもそうでした、YellenはFRB議長としては珍しい熱心な民主党員で、FEDバランスシート正常化の先送り、二回目の金利引き上げの先送りをしたのですが、2016年秋には株価が徐々に下落してしまいました。 次に短いのが1年の変動で気候に関する人の気分や新学期・新年度に関するものです。もっと短いのが週間の変動で、月曜や金曜は特異的な動きをします。こういう繰り返しは左の参考図書「市場のサイクルは永遠に」に解説されています。 Are We In A Secular Bull Market? Written by Lance Roberts | Jan, 7, 2019 Just recently, Jeff Saut from Raymond James made a very interesting statement with re...
最後の2段落だけ訳をいれておきました。 Fed’s Risky QE4 Stock Ramp Adam Hamilton January 31, 2020 3567 Words The US stock markets dramatically surged mostly in a straight line since mid-October. This extraordinary rally started when the Federal Reserve announced it would resume expanding its balance sheet for the first time in years. The deluge of new liquidity from that quantitative-easing bond buying has again acted like rocket fuel for stock markets. After shooting vertically they are in real trouble when the Fed pulls back. In early October the flagship US S&P 500 stock index (SPX) slumped to 2888. That was a mild 4.6% pullback from late July’s latest record high. The SPX was still having a great year though, up 15.2% year-to-date at that point thanks to extreme Fed easing . After the SPX had plunged 19.8% mostly in Q4’18 in a severe near-bear cor...