There
was a time when in the years following the financial crisis, every
Friday the FDIC would report of one or more small and not small banks
failing, as their liabilities exceeded their assets, who were taken over
by larger peers with a taxpayer subsidy to cover the capital shortfall.
And while this weekly event, also known as "FDIC Failure Friday" has
faded from the US, for now, it has made a grand appearance in China.
China’s financial regulators said on Friday the country’s banking and
insurance regulator and the central bank, will take control of the
small, troubled inner Mongolia-based Baoshang Bank due
to the serious credit risks it poses. The regulator’s control of
Baoshang will last for a year starting on Friday, the People’s Bank of
China (PBOC) and China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission
(CBIRC) said on their websites.
China Construction Bank (CCB) will be entrusted to handle the
business operations of the small lender, based in the industrial city of
Baotou, the statement said.
内モンゴルの小規模貸し手に対しては中国建設銀行が救済する、とその声明に書かれている。
Such a takeover by national authorities is extremely rare, and takes
place amid gathering concerns among regulators and financial analysts
about a renewed surge in bad debts...
... a record pace of corporate defaults,
amounting to 39.2 billion yuan of domestic bond defaults in the first
four months of the year, 3.4 times the total for the same period of
2018...
Moody's analyst Yulia Wan told the WSJ that regulators likely decided
to take over Baoshang to limit any fallout to businesses in Inner
Mongolia. “The move is to reduce the risk of a shock to the local
economy,” said said, adding that the Baoshang takeover appeared
to be the first time that national authorities seized control of a bank
since Chinese lenders started listing on stock markets in the 1990s.
In the past when banks came under pressure, local authorities would
pull together funds from local state-owned firms and investors, or have
another bank stage a takeover.
As Reuters adds, this extremely rare takeover - the
first in nearly three decades - comes at a time when the PBOC has
aggressively eased financial standards and cut reserve ratios for
smaller banks to avoid just this outcome, and highlights the
long struggle of some smaller regional lenders in China, which suffer
from deteriorating asset qualities, inadequate capital buffers, and poor
internal controls and corporate governance
Baoshang Bank rose to prominence after its key stakeholder Tomorrow
Holdings was targeted in a government crackdown on systemic risks posed
by financial conglomerates. The bank was also linked to financier Xiao
Jianhua, according to the WSJ.
Xiao left Hong Kong and crossed the border into mainland China in early
2017, according to statements from Hong Kong police and his company,
and he hasn’t been heard from since.
Later that year, Baoshang "unexpectedly" reported a capital shortage.
この年の遅く、Baoshangは「突然」資金不足を開示した。
Chinese ratings agency Dagong Global Credit Rating Co. then revised its
outlook on Baoshang to negative, questioning the lender’s ability to
repay borrowings. They were right.
中国の格付会社 Dagong Global Credit Rating Coはその時 Baoshanの見通しをネガティブに格下げした、借金返済に際しての貸し手能力に疑念が持たれたのだ。
彼らの判断は正しかった。
Understandably, there is concern the Baosheng takeover "will add to
the vulnerability of country’s financial system amid the economic
slowdown." The reason: if one bank can fail, all can fail. And how long
before depositors jog, run or sprint to their own bank to yank whatever
deposits they have there, in the process beginning the terrifying bank
run domino sequence of events, that eventually collapses China's $40
trillion banking system (by comparison, the US banking system is about
$20 trillion).
While it has been generally described as a "small" bank, Baoshang
had a total of 156.5 billion yuan ($22.68 billion) of outstanding loans
by the end of 2016, a 65% jump from the end of 2014, according
to the bank’s last filing on its assets and liabilities on its website.
What is absolutely bizarre, however, is that the bank's "official" non-performing loan ratio then was only 1.68% as of December 2016. That,
in itself, would never have been sufficient to force a takeover, and
suggests that not only was the bank's real bad debt ratio much higher,
but that China continues to chronically under-represent the true state
of its NPLs to avoid bank runs.
The last time Baoshang disclosed financial data was in the third
quarter of 2017. Then it had 576 billion yuan in assets and 543 billion
yuan in liabilities, with a net profit of 3.2 billion yuan. Based on
those 2017 numbers, analyst Long Chen with consulting firm Gavekal
Dragonomics estimated that Baoshang back then was ranked around the 50th largest bank in the nation. Baoshangが最後に金融データを開示したのは2017Q3だ。このとき資産が576B人民元で、債務は543B人民元だった、またネット利益は3.2B人民元だった。これらの2017年の数値からすると、Gavekal Dragonomicsコンサルティング会社のアナリストLong Chenの見積もりでは、当時Baoshangは50番目に大きな銀行だった。
Naturally, to avoid a panic bank run among other smaller, less
capitalized banks, the CBIRC said that principal and interest on
personal saving accounts in the bank will be fully guaranteed, and the
business operations of Baoshang bank will not be affected by the
takeover.
The takeover of the bank is the first in decades, and takes place
amid China’s crackdown on systemic financial risks, which in February
2018 resulted in the take over of former roll-up giant and conglomerate
Anbang Insurance, which in 2015-2016 made eyebrow-raising investments in
overseas property, including the Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York.
Anbang’s chairman, Wu Xiaohui, was sentenced to 18 years in prison later
that year after being convicted of fraud and abuse of power. Wu
expressed remorse, according to the court that sentenced him, but he
also said he doubted he violated any laws. He hasn’t made a public
statement since.
The question now is whether bank investors, having seen first hand
for the first time in nearly 30 years, that a Chinese bank can fail (and
be taken over by the state), will jog at a leisurely pace, or not so
leisurely, to their own local bank and pull out their deposits in a
cool, calm and collected manner... or not so cool, calm and collected.
If so, the trade with between the US and China will have a clear winner
in the very near future.
多量のオピオイドを米国に送り込み、米国で深刻な麻薬中毒問題を引き起こしています。現代版「阿片戦争」です。あのトヨタ初の女性取締役もオピオイド中毒で逮捕解任されましたよね。 US Is Dependent On China For Almost 80% Of Its Medicine by Tyler Durden Fri, 05/31/2019 - 12:55 Experts are warning that the U.S. has become way too reliant on China for all our medicine , our pain killers, antibiotics, vitamins, aspirin and many cancer treatment medicine. 専門家はこう警告する、米国はすべての医薬品、痛み止め、抗生物質、ビタミン、アスピリン、各種抗がん剤で、中国依存度が高すぎる。 Fox Business reports that according to FDA estimates at least 80 percent of active ingredients found in all of America’s medicine come from abroad, primarily from China . And it’s not just the ingredients, China wants to become the world’s dominant generic drug maker. So far Chinese companies are making generic for everything from high blood pressure to chemotherapy drugs. 90 percent of America’s prescriptions a...
日本と同じくPOMOになる公算が大きいとは思いますが、どうでしょうね。 米国大統領選挙の勝者と11月投票日前数ヶ月の株価の動向には9割以上の相関があります。はっきり言えば、公約とか主義主張には無関係です :) 。この時期株価を維持・上昇すると現職政党勝利、株価が下落すると挑戦政党勝利となります。熱心な民主党員活動家である前FED議長イエレンは頻繁に口先介入をしましたが、量的緩和再開まで踏み込めず、4年前の秋に株価が下落し、トランプ勝利となりました。株価と大統領選挙の相関をトランプは熟知しています、4年前には株価が下落するようしきりと口先介入していました。今年は11月まで株価を維持できるかどうか?どうでしょう。 Mark Your Calendar: Next Week The Fed's Liquidity Drain Begins by Tyler Durden Fri, 01/03/2020 - 14:54 What goes up, must come down, at least in theory. 上昇があれば、その後に下落が伴う、少なくとも理論上ではそうだ。 Ever since the start of October when the Fed launched QE4 - or as some still call it "Not QE" - in response to the Sept repo crisis, figuring out the market has been pretty simple: if the Fed's balance sheet goes up so does the S&P500, and vice versa. 10月にFEDがQE4を始めて以来ーー「Not QE」という人もいるがーー9月のレポ危機に対応したものだが、相場はとても単純になった:FEDがバランス...
What Could Go Wrong? The Fed's Warns On Corporate Debt by Tyler Durden Thu, 05/09/2019 - 11:44 Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com, “So, if the housing market isn’t going to affect the economy, and low interest rates are now a permanent fixture in our society, and there is NO risk in doing anything because we can financially engineer our way out it – then why are all these companies building up departments betting on what could be the biggest crash the world has ever seen? What is more evident is what isn’t being said. Banks aren’t saying “we are gearing up just in case something bad happens.” Quite the contrary – they are gearing up for WHEN it happens. When the turn does come, it will be unlike anything we have ever seen before. The scale of it could be considerable because of the size of some...
先週の記事です。最後の2段落だけ訳をいれておきます。 Gold’s Peculiar Surge Adam Hamilton February 21, 2020 3246 Words Gold is enjoying an awesome week, surging back above $1600 for the first time in nearly 7 years! That big round psychologically-heavy level is really catching traders’ attention, great improving sentiment. Yet this recent gold surge has proven peculiar. Unlike normal rallies, the buying driving this one largely hasn’t come from gold’s usual primary drivers. The stealth buying behind this surge may impair its staying power. This Tuesday gold surged 1.2% higher to close near $1602. It hadn’t crested $1600 on close since way back in late March 2013 fully 6.9 years ago! Long-time gold traders shudder at the dark spring which followed. Within less than several weeks after that last $1600+ close, gold plummeted 16.2%. Most of that came in ...