金鉱株2019Q4ファンダメンタルズ by Zeal
最後の2段落だけ訳を入れておきましょう。
Gold Miners’ Q4’19 Fundamentals
Adam Hamilton March 13, 2020 3325 Words
And with gold
prices even higher in the currently-winding-down Q1, the major gold
miners’ stock-market-leading explosive profits growth is likely to
persist. That will force valuations even lower, enticing in big
institutional value investors. Once gold mostly finishes correcting
and battering miners’ stocks, the buy-low opportunities resulting
should be awesome. Low prices with fast-improving fundamentals are
crazy-bullish.
そしてゴールド価格はこのQ1を通じてまだ高い、株式市場をリードする大手金鉱会社の利益は爆発的に増えており、これは当分続くだろう。となるとバリュエーションはさらに低なり、大手法人バリュー投資家を引きつけるだろう。ゴールド価格調整と大手金鉱株のダメッジが収束し始めると、素晴らしい安値で買う機会となる。ファンダメンタルズが急速に回復する中での株安はとんでもない強気状況だ。
Adam Hamilton, CPA March 13, 2020 Subscribe
Gold Miners’ Q4’19 Fundamentals
Adam Hamilton March 13, 2020 3325 Words
With
the major gold miners’ stocks getting bludgeoned, smart contrarian
traders are salivating at coming great buy-low opportunities! With
the COVID-19 pandemic’s extreme fear terrifying the markets, it’s
very important to stay grounded in the gold stocks’ underlying
fundamentals. Just this week they are finishing reporting their
Q4’19 results, which were incredibly impressive thanks to recent
higher prevailing gold prices.
With
the sheer market chaos this week, suddenly everyone is rightfully
interested in COVID-19. I have covered that outbreak’s daily
progress in much depth since January in our subscription
newsletters. The early revelations out of China were very
troubling, which complacent American traders foolishly ignored. So
if you want to understand this pandemic’s evolution, and what is
really happening, read our newsletters.
I
also warned in late February when gold blasted over $1600 on
COVID-19 fears that gold’s surge was
peculiar and
precarious. Speculators’ gold-futures trading and gold
investment buying, which are this metal’s primary drivers, were
signaling an imminent sharp selloff rather than a sustainable
upleg! So we were short gold and gold stocks via put options and
leveraged ETFs, which I was ridiculed for at the time.
Those contrarian trades soon yielded excellent realized gains!
When everyone else is excited about gold stocks is exactly the wrong
time to be, because they’ve already won the majority of their
near-term gains. But with this sector growing hated again after
plummeting, we need to be licking our chops and getting ready to
redeploy in force! So this is an exceedingly-opportune time to dig
in to their latest fundamentals.
Because most gold miners logically run calendar financial years, Q4
reporting has an extended deadline up to 60 days after quarter-end
in the US. In Canada where the majority of global gold stocks
trade, the reporting deadline for full years extends out to 90
days. Annual reports including final quarters are bigger, more
complex, and must be audited by independent CPAs. These results are
still coming out this week.
The
definitive list of major gold-mining stocks to analyze comes from
the world’s most-popular gold-stock investment vehicle, the GDX
VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF. Launched way back in May 2006, it
has an insurmountable first-mover lead. GDX’s net assets running
$11.2b this week were a staggering 31.4x larger than the
next-biggest 1x-long major-gold-miners ETF! GDX is effectively this
sector’s blue-chip index.
While GDX’s holdings were running a ridiculously-large 47 stocks
this week, every quarter I delve into the latest results from the
top 34. That’s simply an arbitrary number that fits neatly into the
tables below. But it is a commanding sample, as these world’s
largest gold miners accounted for fully 94.4% of GDX’s total
weighting this week. They trade in stock markets across the globe,
with differing reporting requirements.
That
makes amassing this valuable dataset for analysis challenging and
tedious. In different countries, the major gold miners report
different data in different ways. Half-year reporting rather than
our superior US quarterly reporting is also common around the
world. That necessitates splitting reported data in half for
quarterly approximations. Every gold miner has its own reporting
peculiarities, taking time to understand.
The
more quarterly iterations of this complex research thread I run, the
better the results get. Q4’19 was my 15th quarter in a row
of this deep fundamental GDX-gold-stock analysis, adding on to my
massive spreadsheets. The highlights of the major gold miners’
latest results make it into the tables below. Blank fields mean a
company hadn’t reported that particular data as of this essay’s
late-Wednesday cutoff.
Each
company’s symbol and weighting within GDX is followed by its
quarterly gold production in Q4’19. Not all of these stocks trade
in the US, as GDX also hosts sizable Australian and Canadian
contingents. The year-over-year change in miners’ gold outputs from
Q4’18 to Q4’19 reveals whether they are growing or shrinking. Cash
costs and all-in sustaining costs per ounce show how much is spent
producing that gold.
Next
the YoY changes are shown in the major gold miners’ key financial
data including operating cash flows generated, accounting earnings,
revenues, and cash on hand. Percentage changes aren’t recorded if
they would be misleading or not meaningful. That includes data
shifting from positive to negative or vice versa from Q4’18, or if
derived from two negative numbers. Then raw underlying data is
included instead.
This
entire dataset together offers a fantastic high-level read on how
the major gold miners are faring. And they enjoyed massive
fundamental improvements last quarter! Higher prevailing gold
prices drove profitability sharply higher, forcing valuations much
lower. The elite GDX gold miners haven’t looked this great on an
operational basis in years, making this recent plunge
I warned about
an amazing buying opportunity.
The
gold miners’ stocks are ultimately just leveraged plays on gold.
The yellow metal’s prices dominate their current profits and future
earnings potential, so major gold stocks tend to amplify gold’s
material price swings by 2x to 3x. While gold enjoyed a
solid 3.0% gain in Q4’19, its average price stayed high near $1483.
That was a whopping 20.8% above Q4’18’s average, which was a huge
boon for gold miners!
The
GDX-top-34 collectively produced 10.0m ounces of gold last quarter,
which was 2.7% better than the prior year’s Q4. The equivalent of
311.5 metric tons, that was 35% of total world mine production in
Q4’19 per the World Gold Council’s definitive data. But that
impressive aggregate production growth from these major gold miners
is somewhat misleading due to a couple of GDX-top-34 mergers over
this past year.
In
mid-January 2019, super-major miner Newmont Mining announced it was
acquiring major miner Goldcorp for $10.0b in stock. That followed
another colossal acquisition of Barrick Gold buying Randgold in late
September 2018. Unfortunately these mega-mergers are
bad for this
industry, as I explained in depth shortly after. In late
November 2019, Kirkland Lake Gold said it was spending $4.9b to
acquire Detour Gold.
As
both acquired companies were GDX-top-34 ones in Q4’18, merging them
made room for two other miners to climb into those elite ranks. The
biggest are Harmony Gold and Eldorado Gold, which have their symbols
highlighted in light-blue showing they are new among GDX’s top 34.
Together these two companies mined 463k ounces of gold in Q4’19,
which is 4.6% of the GDX-top-34 total production last quarter.
Excluding just these two new additions, the GDX-top-34’s aggregate
gold output actually shrunk by 2.0% from Q4’18. So production
growth remains elusive for this industry as a whole, with individual
miners’ performances varying widely. For better comparisons in that
pair of newly-merged companies, I added their predecessors’
production and financial results in Q4’18 before computing the YoY
changes last quarter.
Gold-stock investors prize production growth above everything
else, as it is the lifeblood of this industry. The more gold
individual companies produce, the more capital they have to grow by
expanding existing operations and building new mines. And the
recently-merged Newmont and Kirkland Lake both saw sharp production
declines in Q4’19 compared to their predecessor companies’ total
outputs achieved in Q4’18.
Newmont’s production plunged 11.8% YoY while Kirkland Lake’s
plummeted 28.2%! That highlights yet again how major-gold-stock
mergers usually fail to yield overall output increases despite their
big dilution to acquiring shareholders. The merged companies’ gold
produced tends to deteriorate from their earlier separate totals.
Mergers also tend to increase per-ounce costs, as evident in
Newmont’s climbing ones.
Interestingly the GDX-top-34’s 2.0% gold-output decline excluding
those largest newest stocks is right in line with the overall global
data from the World Gold Council. It reported worldwide production
fell 1.8% YoY in Q4’19. That was the fourth quarter in a row
of contracting output, which is utterly unprecedented in modern
times! Gold is getting harder to find and more-expensive to
extract, buttressing peak-gold theories.
With
the major gold miners as an industry suffering waning production for
an entire year now, it makes the companies still growing their
outputs all the more valuable. If I had room in these tables, I’d
include the change in each miner’s relative rank in GDX’s weightings
over this past year. Those are based on market capitalizations.
Gold miners able to grow their production generally see
proportionally-outsized stock gains.
So
when I pick individual gold stocks to buy, current and
projected-near-future production growth is always an important
consideration. Generally the more gold individual companies mine,
the larger the cash flows they generate and the faster they can
expand in the future. But once miners grow too big like the
super-majors Newmont and Barrick commanding 26.5% of GDX’s total
weighting, boosting outputs is very hard.
Prevailing gold prices and gold production aren’t the only key
drivers of gold-stock earnings and thus their ultimate
stock-price-appreciation potential. Mining costs are equally
important. It doesn’t matter how big a miner gets if it sells its
product at a loss, like many horribly-flawed tech-stock IPOs in
recent years. So how much miners have to spend to wrest their metal
from the bowels of the earth is also critical to watch.
Gold-mining costs are largely fixed quarter after quarter, with
production requiring roughly the same levels of infrastructure,
equipment, and employees. These big fixed costs are largely
determined during mine-planning stages, when engineers and
geologists decide which gold-bearing ores to mine, how to dig to
them, and how to recover their gold. That makes rising gold prices
really potent in catapulting earnings higher!
So
Q4’19’s average gold price soaring 20.8% YoY had to fuel outstanding
profits growth. But that is complicated by individual mine
operations. Every gold mine has a finite limit on the ore
throughput that it can process, measured in tons per day. Even with
mills chewing through the same amounts of rock every day, gold
produced varies considerably with ore grades. They differ
greatly even within individual gold deposits.
Lower-grade ores must be blasted and excavated on the way to
higher-grade targets. Mine managers have to decide how to mix these
ores to feed into their mills, governing the amounts of gold they
are able to recover. These decisions are made based on
new-fiscal-year capital budgets, seasonal construction windows, and
managers trying to maximize their share-based compensation. This
really affects production.
According to the World Gold Council’s comprehensive data, on average
since 2010 calendar Q1s, Q2s, Q3s, and Q4s have seen global gold
output running -8.1%, +5.7%, +5.9%, and -0.2% from the preceding
quarter. Production falls sharply in Q1s, before surging back
up in Q2s and Q3s. Then Q4s tend to start shrinking again. This is
relevant because gold-mining costs are inversely proportional to
production levels.
With
mining costs largely fixed, the more gold recovered from processed
ores the lower per-ounce costs since there are more ounces to spread
them across. So Q4’19s lower gold output among the GDX-top-34 after
adjusting for those big mergers portended higher costs. That’s not
a problem when costs are relatively low compared to and rising
slower than prevailing gold prices, which sure proved the case last
quarter.
Cash
costs are the classic measure of gold-mining costs, including all
cash expenses necessary to mine each ounce of gold. They are
misleading as a true cost measure though, excluding big capital
needed to explore for gold deposits and build mines. Cash costs are
best viewed as an acid test of survivability for the gold miners,
revealing gold-price levels required to keep the mines running.
They indeed rose in Q4.
These GDX-top-34 gold miners reported average cash costs last
quarter of $672 per ounce. That’s up on the high side compared to
the prior 14 quarters’ range from $591 to $679. But it’s still only
up 2.6% YoY, in line with the production decline. And Harmony
Gold’s new inclusion in the GDX-top-34 is skewing this number high,
as its deep South African mines are very expensive to operate.
Ex-Harmony, the average is $657.
All-in sustaining costs are far superior than cash costs, and were
introduced by the World Gold Council in June 2013. They add on to
cash costs everything else that is necessary to maintain and
replenish gold-mining operations at current output tempos.
AISCs give a much-better understanding of what it really costs to
maintain gold mines as ongoing concerns, and reveal the major gold
miners’ true operating profitability.
The
GDX-top-34 gold miners reporting AISCs in Q4’19 averaged $942 per
ounce. That surged a sharp 6.0% higher YoY, and was the highest
by far in the 15 quarters I’ve been laboring on this research
thread. Harmony again dragged this average higher, with its $1283
AISCs. So did Peru’s troubled Buenaventura, with an even-higher
$1311 on falling production. Excluding those outliers, the average
climbed 2.7% YoY.
But
gold-mining costs are definitely rising, just like everywhere else
thanks to central banks’ incessant
inflationary
money printing. With gold prices rising far faster than all-in
sustaining costs though, the major gold miners’ earnings still
soared. Subtracting quarters’ average GDX-top-34 AISCs from their
average prevailing gold prices shows implied gold-mining-industry
profitability. And it has been rocketing higher.
Q4’19’s $1483 average gold less $942 average AISCs yields
major-gold-miner earnings of $541 per ounce. That skyrocketed a
staggering 59.6% YoY compared to Q4’18’s $339 derived from $1228
average gold and $889 average GDX-top-34 AISCs! Even before
COVID-19 fears started slowing down the world economy, the major
gold miners were showing the best sector earnings growth in the
entire stock markets.
And
this trend isn’t over, with Q1’20 almost certain to look even
better. So far this quarter gold’s average has soared way up to
$1589, blasting 7.1% higher quarter-on-quarter. Assuming the past
four quarters’ average GDX-top-34 AISCs of $910 hold, sector implied
profitability is off the charts at $679. That would be another
65.6% YoY gain from Q1’19’s levels! Profits growth will be huge
even if Q1’20 AISCs surge again.
So
as gold-stock prices have been crushed in recent weeks on plummeting
stock markets and weakening gold, their underlying fundamentals
are looking awesome. That makes this coming bottoming a
fantastic opportunity to buy low in a pricing anomaly driven by
extreme sentiment. Our newsletter subscribers who wisely kept their
powder dry in the recent euphoric unsustainable runup are looking
forward to buying big.
All
we need are green
lights on gold from gold-futures speculators’ positioning and
gold investment capital flows. Those are likely coming soon, giving
us a valuable window to skim off this sector’s dross to uncover the
gold miners with the best upside potential. That’s determined by
both their fundamental outlooks and current technical levels.
Buying low when others are scared will yield the best gains
in gold’s next upleg.
With
average gold prices 20.8% higher YoY in Q4’19 and adjusted
GDX-top-34 gold output down 2.0%, these major gold miners’ total
sales growth should’ve been near 19%. It actually came in up 19.6%
YoY last quarter to $16.1b of revenues. That was buoyed by these
elite gold miners’ collective silver output rising 6.5% YoY to 30.9m
ounces. That is righteous, with none of the new GDX-top-34 stocks
mining silver.
These higher sales naturally drove big gains in operating cash flows
generated. The GDX-top-34 saw their total OCFs rocket 51.2% higher
YoY to $6.0b! The more cash their operations are spinning off, the
more they can spend on expanding existing mines and building new
ones to grow their outputs. And they are certainly investing and
doing that, as their total cash war chests only grew 15.0% YoY to a
hefty $14.1b.
The
major gold miners’ hard accounting profits reported to their
national securities regulators per those countries’ accounting rules
improved radically last quarter. The GDX-top-34’s total
earnings in Q4’19 ran $3.6b, vastly better than the $5.9b loss they
collectively reported in Q4’18. These fat profits forced the
trailing-twelve-month price-to-earnings ratios on some of these
stocks into the low teens or single digits!
That
proves the gold miners are cheap absolutely, and will be picked up
by institutional investors using computers to screen for low
valuations. The world’s two largest gold miners that mutual funds
are most likely to buy, Newmont and Barrick, were running dirt-cheap
P/Es of 12.3x and 8.9x in the middle of this week! That’s
exceedingly-low for this often-high-flying sector, a heck of a
fundamental bargain to buy.
Unfortunately both last quarter and the comparable one saw
gold-miner accounting earnings heavily skewed by non-cash charges.
Accounting rules require mines to be written down if falling gold
prices make them look worth less, and these non-cash impairment
charges are flushed through the miners’ income statements. In Q4’18
the gold-stock mega-mergers and lower gold prices made impairments
flare.
Then
Barrick reported a $0.9b impairment charge, while Goldcorp which
Newmont was buying wrote off an unbelievable $4.7b in assets! It
was kitchen-sinking all possible impairments so they wouldn’t have
to be run through the acquiring company’s earnings later. Excluding
those two impairment charges alone, and there were plenty other
smaller ones, slashes Q4’18’s GDX-top-34 losses from $5.9b to a
far-better $0.3b.
While impairment charges are understandable, accounting rules also
allow them to be reversed. That adds even more volatility to
bottom-line profits when gold has powered higher considerably.
Every time I wade through income statements in this sector, I look
for and record any large and unusual charges or gains. Q4’19’s
blowout profits among the GDX-top-34 were heavily skewed by
impairment reversals.
Together Newmont, Barrick, Agnico Eagle, and Kinross Gold reported a
staggering $1.6b in gains from impairment reversals and other
unusual things that don’t represent operating income. So even that
alone excluding the rest of the GDX-top-34’s noncash weirdness
slashes Q4’19’s accounting earnings to $1.9b. So instead of that
epic headline -$5.9b to +$3.6b YoY swing, the reality is a lot
closer to -$0.3b to +$1.9b.
That’s still nothing to sneeze at, especially with prevailing gold
prices remaining high indicating that gold-mining profitability
should continue exploding higher. The COVID-19 impact on
gold-mining operations is likely to be minimal compared to other
sectors too. Gold mines are usually way out in the sticks away from
civilization, and mine employees are generally spread out across
operations not exposed to many people.
While the recent COVID-19-fear-fueled gold-stock plunge was brutal
for those trapped unaware, it is working to create awesome buying
opportunities. Near-panic selling as the stock markets plummeted
and gold seemingly-paradoxically rolled over in the midst of that
carnage crushed gold-stock prices. Yet at the same time the major
gold miners’ underlying fundamentals are greatly improving,
these stocks are cheap!
To
multiply your capital in the markets, you have to trade like a
contrarian. That means buying low when few others are willing, so
you can later sell high when few others can. In the first half of
2019 well before gold stocks soared higher, we recommended buying
many fundamentally-superior gold and silver miners in our popular
weekly and
monthly
newsletters. We later realized big gains including
109.7%, 105.8%,
and 103.0%!
To
profitably trade high-potential gold stocks, you need to stay
informed about the broader market cycles that drive gold. Our
newsletters are a great way, easy to read and affordable. They draw
on my vast experience, knowledge, wisdom, and ongoing research to
explain what’s going on in the markets, why, and how to trade them
with specific stocks. Subscribe
today and take advantage of our 20%-off sale! Get
onboard now so you can mirror our coming trades for gold’s next
upleg after this correction largely passes.
The bottom line is
the major gold miners just reported outstanding Q4 results.
Much-higher prevailing gold prices dwarfed slightly-declining
production and proportionally-rising costs. That fueled big
revenues growth, soaring operating-cash-flow generation, and
radically-higher accounting profits. All this left some of the
world’s biggest gold miners trading at dirt-cheap price-to-earnings
ratios in the low teens and single digits!
要約すると、大手金鉱株がQ4決算を開示した。ゴールド価格が大きく値を上げたため、生産量低下やそれに伴うコスト増が無視できるほどだ。この結果売上が大きく増え、営業利益も大きく増え、会計利益も素晴らしいものだった。この状況で世界最大級の多くの金鉱会社が極端な割安となり、PERが10代の低めから一桁になった!
要約すると、大手金鉱株がQ4決算を開示した。ゴールド価格が大きく値を上げたため、生産量低下やそれに伴うコスト増が無視できるほどだ。この結果売上が大きく増え、営業利益も大きく増え、会計利益も素晴らしいものだった。この状況で世界最大級の多くの金鉱会社が極端な割安となり、PERが10代の低めから一桁になった!
そしてゴールド価格はこのQ1を通じてまだ高い、株式市場をリードする大手金鉱会社の利益は爆発的に増えており、これは当分続くだろう。となるとバリュエーションはさらに低なり、大手法人バリュー投資家を引きつけるだろう。ゴールド価格調整と大手金鉱株のダメッジが収束し始めると、素晴らしい安値で買う機会となる。ファンダメンタルズが急速に回復する中での株安はとんでもない強気状況だ。
Adam Hamilton, CPA March 13, 2020 Subscribe