Commercial and industrial (C&I) loan activity is watched
closely by economists to gauge the strength of the economy and estimate
where we are in the business cycle. C&I loans are used to
finance capital expenditures or increase the borrower’s working capital.
The C&I loan cycle often takes up to a couple of years to turn
positive after a recession, but provides even more confirmation that an
economic expansion is underway. For example, the U.S. Great Recession
officially ended in June 2009, but the C&I loan cycle didn’t turn
positive until late-2010. C&I loans also help to warn when the economic cycle is approaching its end (as they are now).
C&I ローン(企業の設備投資や運転資金に利用するローン)動向がエコノミストに注視されている、経済の強さや景気サイクルで今どこにいるかを判断するためにだ。C&Iローンは設備投資や運転資金に用いられる。景気後退後にC&Iローンが上昇するのは2年ほどの遅れがある、しかしこういう状況のときには経済拡大が起きていることが確実だ。たとえば、米国のGreat Recessionは2009年6月に終わったが、C&Iローンが増えるのは2010年遅くだった。C&Iローンはまた景気拡大終焉の警告ともなる(まさにいまがそうだ)。
Total outstanding U.S. commercial and industrial loans have increased
by 92% in the current cycle, which surpasses the 80% increase during
the mid-2000s cycle and the 88% increase during the late-1990s cycle:
One way of determining when the C&I loan cycle (and,
therefore, the overall economic cycle) is nearing its end is by charting
total outstanding commercial and industrial loans as a percentage of
GDP. When C&I loans are at 10% of GDP or higher (the
“Danger Zone”), that is typically a sign that the cycle is long in the
tooth and about to tip over into a recession. According to the chart
below, recessions occurred shortly after C&I loans peaked within the “Danger Zone.” C&I
loans are currently in that zone, which I see as further confirmation
that we are in a Fed-driven economic bubble that will end badly.
The current C&I loan cycle has been more powerful and
longer-lasting than the prior two cycles because the Fed has held
interest rates at record low levels for a record length of time. As the
chart below shows, credit booms and bubbles form during low interest
rate periods (low interest rates encourage borrowing):
現在のC&Iローンサイクルは過去二回のものよりも力強く長期に渡るものだった、というのも、FEDが金利を記録的低位にかつ記録的長期に渡り維持したためだ。下のチャートに示すが、与信ブームとバブルが見て取れる、低金利が借金しやすくするためだ:
The U.S. corporate debt market (which is mostly in the form of bonds
instead loans) is telling a similar message as commercial and industrial
loans, as I recently discussed.
To summarize, ultra-low bond yields over the past decade have
encouraged a corporate borrowing bubble that has also been funding the
stock buyback boom. As a result, total outstanding U.S.
corporate debt has increased by $3 trillion or 45% since the last peak
in 2008. U.S. corporate debt is now at an all-time high of over 46% of
GDP, which is even worse than the levels reached during the dot-com bubble and mid-2000s housing bubble.
I am fully aware that both C&I loans and corporate debt
may reach a higher percentage of GDP in this cycle due to how low
interest rates are. Still, it is important to be aware of the risks that
are building up and not be complacent. When the Fed and other
central banks hold interest rates at low levels, they create market
distortions and encourage malinvestment or unwise lending decisions that
would not otherwise occur in a normal interest rate environment. These
malinvestments are revealed once interest rates are raised and the
economic cycle turns (read my piece about this in Forbes). A
tremendous amount of malinvestment has accumulated after a decade of
artificially low interest rates, which is going to result in serious
pain when the cycle inevitably turns – make no mistake about that. 今回の景気サイクルでC&Iローンも企業債務もともに対GDPでみると最悪なのは低金利のためだと私は分かっている。FEDや世界中の中央銀行が低金利政策をとったために、市場をゆがめmalinvestmentを増やし、通常の金利なら起こりえない馬鹿げた貸出判断をしてしまった。今後金利が上昇し景気サイクルが変わると、これらのmalinvestmentsが明らかになる(私のForbsの記事を読むが良い)。人工的に低金利を10年も続けたため意にとんでもない数のmalinvestmentが積み上がっている、景気サイクルが変わると深刻な痛みを伴うだろうーー決してこの件で投資判断を間違ってはいけない。
文章全体がZeroHedge特有の皮肉で満ちています。 Global Earnings Downgrades At Highest Level In 10 Years by Tyler Durden Thu, 01/10/2019 - 16:45 As stock markets plunged in December, asset-gatherers and commission-takers (and politicians) rushed on to every media outlet to reassure everyone that the fundamentals are "solid", "extremely strong", "very positive" ... pick your spin. The only problem is that top-down, the fundamentals are dismally disappointing... 12月の株式急落で、株式を買い集めている人、手数料狙いの人(そして政治家)はメディアに出ずっぱりで誰もにこう訴えた、ファンダメンタルズは「健全」、「とても強い」、「とてもポジティブ」・・・みなさんもこれに振り回された。唯一の問題はこれらは上意下達であることだ、実際のファンダメンタルズは悲しいかな失望するものだ・・・・ And bottom-up, the fundamentals are almost as bad as they have ever been as analysts take the ax to their outlooks... the number of analysts’ global earnings downgrades exceeded upgrades by the most since 2...
米国はよく理解してませんが、日本の場合では量的緩和で日銀が国債買い上げした資金は日銀当座預金にそのままです、市中には流れていません。でもNHKのニュース等では「ジャブジャブ」という表現をアナウンサーが使い、さらに丁寧に水道の蛇口からお金が吐き出される画像まで示してくれます。これって心理効果が大きいですよね。量的緩和とは何かを7時のニュースや新聞でこれ以上丁寧に解説するのはそう簡単ではありません。一般の人も株式をやっている人も「イメージ」で捉える以上はそう簡単にできません。多くの人は量的緩和とはなにか、を理解していないと私は想像しています。 ただし、国債を買い上げるので長期金利が低下し住宅ローン金利等が下がったのは確実な効果です。一方で長短金利差が少なくなると銀行のビジネスモデルが成り立たなくなりますが。 This Is The One Chart Every Trader Should Have "Taped To Their Screen" by Tyler Durden Sat, 01/19/2019 - 18:55 After a year of tapering, the Fed’s balance sheet finally captured the market’s attention during the last three months of 2018. 一年間のテーパリング後、FEDバランスシートがとうとう市場の注目をあびることになった、2018年の最後の3ヶ月だ。 By the start of the fourth quarter, the Fed had finished raising the caps on monthly roll-off of its balance sheet to the full $50bn per month (peaking at $30bn USTs, $20bn MBS...