Commercial and industrial (C&I) loan activity is watched
closely by economists to gauge the strength of the economy and estimate
where we are in the business cycle. C&I loans are used to
finance capital expenditures or increase the borrower’s working capital.
The C&I loan cycle often takes up to a couple of years to turn
positive after a recession, but provides even more confirmation that an
economic expansion is underway. For example, the U.S. Great Recession
officially ended in June 2009, but the C&I loan cycle didn’t turn
positive until late-2010. C&I loans also help to warn when the economic cycle is approaching its end (as they are now).
C&I ローン(企業の設備投資や運転資金に利用するローン)動向がエコノミストに注視されている、経済の強さや景気サイクルで今どこにいるかを判断するためにだ。C&Iローンは設備投資や運転資金に用いられる。景気後退後にC&Iローンが上昇するのは2年ほどの遅れがある、しかしこういう状況のときには経済拡大が起きていることが確実だ。たとえば、米国のGreat Recessionは2009年6月に終わったが、C&Iローンが増えるのは2010年遅くだった。C&Iローンはまた景気拡大終焉の警告ともなる(まさにいまがそうだ)。
Total outstanding U.S. commercial and industrial loans have increased
by 92% in the current cycle, which surpasses the 80% increase during
the mid-2000s cycle and the 88% increase during the late-1990s cycle:
One way of determining when the C&I loan cycle (and,
therefore, the overall economic cycle) is nearing its end is by charting
total outstanding commercial and industrial loans as a percentage of
GDP. When C&I loans are at 10% of GDP or higher (the
“Danger Zone”), that is typically a sign that the cycle is long in the
tooth and about to tip over into a recession. According to the chart
below, recessions occurred shortly after C&I loans peaked within the “Danger Zone.” C&I
loans are currently in that zone, which I see as further confirmation
that we are in a Fed-driven economic bubble that will end badly.
The current C&I loan cycle has been more powerful and
longer-lasting than the prior two cycles because the Fed has held
interest rates at record low levels for a record length of time. As the
chart below shows, credit booms and bubbles form during low interest
rate periods (low interest rates encourage borrowing):
現在のC&Iローンサイクルは過去二回のものよりも力強く長期に渡るものだった、というのも、FEDが金利を記録的低位にかつ記録的長期に渡り維持したためだ。下のチャートに示すが、与信ブームとバブルが見て取れる、低金利が借金しやすくするためだ:
The U.S. corporate debt market (which is mostly in the form of bonds
instead loans) is telling a similar message as commercial and industrial
loans, as I recently discussed.
To summarize, ultra-low bond yields over the past decade have
encouraged a corporate borrowing bubble that has also been funding the
stock buyback boom. As a result, total outstanding U.S.
corporate debt has increased by $3 trillion or 45% since the last peak
in 2008. U.S. corporate debt is now at an all-time high of over 46% of
GDP, which is even worse than the levels reached during the dot-com bubble and mid-2000s housing bubble.
I am fully aware that both C&I loans and corporate debt
may reach a higher percentage of GDP in this cycle due to how low
interest rates are. Still, it is important to be aware of the risks that
are building up and not be complacent. When the Fed and other
central banks hold interest rates at low levels, they create market
distortions and encourage malinvestment or unwise lending decisions that
would not otherwise occur in a normal interest rate environment. These
malinvestments are revealed once interest rates are raised and the
economic cycle turns (read my piece about this in Forbes). A
tremendous amount of malinvestment has accumulated after a decade of
artificially low interest rates, which is going to result in serious
pain when the cycle inevitably turns – make no mistake about that. 今回の景気サイクルでC&Iローンも企業債務もともに対GDPでみると最悪なのは低金利のためだと私は分かっている。FEDや世界中の中央銀行が低金利政策をとったために、市場をゆがめmalinvestmentを増やし、通常の金利なら起こりえない馬鹿げた貸出判断をしてしまった。今後金利が上昇し景気サイクルが変わると、これらのmalinvestmentsが明らかになる(私のForbsの記事を読むが良い)。人工的に低金利を10年も続けたため意にとんでもない数のmalinvestmentが積み上がっている、景気サイクルが変わると深刻な痛みを伴うだろうーー決してこの件で投資判断を間違ってはいけない。
Amazonで買物をしてContrarianJを応援しよう この長文記事をRay Dalioが発表し、ゴールドは$1400から$1420へと急騰しました。GLD保持高に変化はないのでたぶん先物ポジションが進んでいます。 Ray Dalio Warns A "New Paradigm" Is Coming: "Buy Gold, Sell Stocks" by Tyler Durden Wed, 07/17/2019 - 14:44 Authored by Ray Dalio via LinkedIn, One of my investment principles is: 私の投資原則はこういうものだ: Identify the paradigm you’re in, examine if and how it is unsustainable, and visualize how the paradigm shift will transpire when that which is unsustainable stops. 現在のパラダイムを認識し、それがどの程度持続可能かどうか判断する、そしてパラダイムシフトがどのように起きるか、そしてその着地点を思い描く。 Over my roughly 50 years of being a global macro investor, I have observed there to be relatively long of periods (about 10 years) in which the markets and market relationships operate in a certain way (which I call “paradig...
Amazonで買物をしてContrarianJを応援しよう Silver Outperforming Gold 2 Adam Hamilton July 26, 2019 3232 Words Silver has blasted higher in the last couple weeks, far outperforming gold. This is certainly noteworthy, as silver has stunk up the precious-metals joint for years. This deeply-out-of-favor metal may be embarking on a sea-change sentiment shift, finally returning to amplifying gold’s upside. Silver is not only radically undervalued relative to gold, but investors are aggressively buying. Silver’s upside potential is massive. ここ2週シルバーは急騰した、ゴールドを遥かに凌ぐものだ。これは注目すべきことだ、もう何年もシルバーはひどいものだった。この極端に嫌われた金属が大きく心理を買えている、とうとうゴールド上昇を増幅するに至った。シルバーは対ゴールドで極端に過小評価されているだけでなく、投資家は積極的に買い進んでいる。シルバーの潜在上昇力は巨大なものだ。 Silver’s performance in recent years has been brutally bad, repelling all but the most fanatical contrarians. Historically silver prices have been mostly ...
How Are Gold And Money Supply Related? by Tyler Durden Sun, 06/14/2020 - 13:00 Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk, M2 Money Supply is surging. Will gold follow? M2マネーサプライが急増している。ゴールドはこれを追従するだろうか? Let's investigate an alleged relationship between gold and M2, a measure of money supply in the US. よく言われるM2(米国のマネーサプライ指標)とゴールドの関係について調べてみよう。 "There’s a clear correlation between the annual growth rate in M2 money supply and the price of the yellow metal. " 「M2の年率増加速度とゴールド価格の間には明らかな相関がある。」 Clear Correlation? 明らかな相関? The Tweet claims something different than my lead chart depicts. So let's investigate the above idea in other time frames. このツイートの主張は私が示す最初のチャートが示すものとは異なる。というわけでこのtweetの主張を別の時間フレームで見てみよう。 Gold vs Rate of Change in M2 Money Supply ゴールド vs M2マネーサプライの変化率 If we look at longer time frames, the rate of increase in M2 theory falls flat on its face....