What a difference a few years makes. Back in the summer of 2015, a WSJ op-ed writer, who somehow was unaware of the past 6,000 years of human history, infamously and embarrassingly said "Let’s Be Honest About Gold: It’s a Pet Rock."
Fast forward to today, when with every central bank once again rushing
to debase its currency in what increasingly appears to be the final race
to the debasement bottom, when even BOE head Mark Carney recommends
that it is time to retire the dollar as the world's reserve currency, pet rock gold has emerged as the second best performing asset of the year... and at the rate it is going -4th in 2017, 3rd in 2018, 2nd in 2019 - gold will be the standout asset class of 2020.
Which naturally has sparked comparisons for gold's performance in
2019 with 2008+, when gold exploded higher as the financial system
nearly collapsed and central banks started injecting trillions in
liquidity into the system to keep it afloat.
Are such comparisons appropriate?
As Bank of America writes in "anatomy of two gold bull markets", in comparing the gold bull markets in 2008 and 2018, real rates remain key price drivers,
while a critical difference in market dynamics - this time around - is
that central banks have been unable to reflate global economies and
even as metrics like the value and proportion of negative yielding
assets has been increasing, further easing is on the cards. Linked to
that, Bank of America makes a stunning admissions: "the risk of quantitative failure, which was not a concern in 2008, makes gold an attractive asset."
Taking a step back, for those who have not been following the
performance of gold in the past year, the yellow metal has been one of
the best performing commodities over the past year, rallying by 31%
since bottoming in August 2018, as whon in the first chart which
highlights that recent price dynamics have to some extent mirrored those
seen in 2008+; the data also shows that the current bull market is
still young. Partially because of that, Bank of America notes that it
has been frequently been asked how the current macro backdrop compares
to dynamics 10 years ago.
So what sparked the tremendous 2008 rally which lasted for the next three years?
では２００８年の素晴らしいラリーは何が原因だったのだろう、しかもその後三年も続いた。
Looking back at the Great Financial Crisis, central banks reacted to
the turmoil on financial markets by easing monetary policy through both
traditional, but increasingly also non-traditional policy tools
Since gold is a non-yielding asset, the reduction in opportunity
costs and uncertainty over where the global economy and markets were
headed made the commodity an interesting investment.
This is shown in Chart 4, which suggests that sharp declines in US real rates post GFC were accompanied by steady increases in gold quotations. Yet,
US rates then started to change direction in 2013, the year Fed
chairman Ben Bernanke caused the taper tantrum announcing that the Fed
would gradually reduce its bond purchases (Chart 5). This effectively
put an end to gold increases.
この状況はChart 4に示される、GFC後の米国実質金利が急落しそれにともな０１３いゴールド相場が安定して上昇している。しかし２０１３年に米国金利がその動きを変えた、この年FED議長 Ben Bernankeがtaper tantrumを引き起こしたのだ、FEDが徐々に債権買取を減らすと宣言した（Chart 5)．これが実質的にゴールド上昇に終わりを告げた。
After the gold price rally ended, and fell sharply in the wake of the
taper tantrum, gold prices then remained subdued also because ongoing
monetary policy support kept markets buoyant. This is shown in chart 6, which highlights that falling volatility was ultimately accompanied by lower gold quotations.
Of course, this was also influenced by an acceleration of the US
economy, which picked up post GFC and in 2015 printed some of the
highest growth rates in a decade
Unfortunately, the central banks' fairy tale did not last, and the
"strong economic growth" came with a significant wrinkle: inflation
remained well below the 2% target. The chart shows data for the US, but
the lack of upward pressure on general price levels has been equally
pronounced in other countries/ regions including Japan/ Europe.
Yet notwithstanding the ongoing lack of reflation, central banks
around the world seem adamant that monetary easing will ultimately do
the job - as in it didn't work last time, but it will work this time, we
promise - and hence expectations are for more stimulus. The
side-effects of that are mirrored by Chart 8 and Chart 9: value
and proportion of debt with negative yields has risen almost
exponentially of late and this has been a powerful driver of the gold.
This, according to BofA commodity strategists, has various
implications. Most notably, "ultra-easy monetary policies have led to
distortions across various asset classes"; worse - and these are not our
words, but of Bank of America - "it also stopped normal economic
adjustment/ renewal mechanisms by for instance sustaining economic
participants that would normally have gone out of business", i.e. a
record number of zombie corporations.
In addition, as everyone knows, debt levels have continued to
increase, making it more difficult for central banks to normalize
monetary policy as 2018 showed so vividly (and for Powell, painfully).
Which brings us to BofA's conclusion: "We fear that this
dynamic could ultimately lead to "quantitative failure", under which
markets refocus on those elevated liabilities and the lack of global
growth, which would in all likelihood lead to a material increase in
volatility." こういう状況でBoAはこう結論づける：「この力学が「量的失策」となることを恐れている、市場は再度債務増加と世界的成長欠如に注目している、これはボラティリティを大きく増やすことだろう。」
How does gold fall into this: "At the same time, and perhaps
perversely, such a sell-off may prompt central banks to ease more
aggressively, making gold an even more attractive asset to hold." この状況でゴールドはどうなるだろう：「それと同時に、たぶん株式下落を見て中央銀行にさらなる緩和を督促するかもしれない、こうなるとゴールドは更に魅力をますことになる。」
In other words, as the world approaches the financial endgame and
central banks are out of ammo beside just doing more of the same - that
led the world to the current catastrophic state - gold will be the
biggest beneficiary of the upcoming financial cataclysm. And, no, this
is not some fringe blog predicting the apocalypse, this is the
prediction of one the 4 largest US banks.
この記事よりももっと詳しい分析がこちらにあります。： https://www.adamtownsend.me/china-financial-stability-report/ 元データは毎年開示されるPBOCの英文報告に基づいたものです： http://www.pbc.gov.cn/english/130736/index.html ただ、毎年２００ページ超もあり、そう簡単に読みこなせるものではありません。この記事の表のようなわかりやすい形で整理して開示はしていません。この記事の表にはどの年の何ページに書かれたデータであるかが示されています。日本語ネットの記事ではシャードーバンクの規模がよくわからないというものが多いですが、毎年PBOC自らがシャドーバンク規模を自ら認めています。その規模は驚くものです。 この記事に書かれている数値は驚くばかりです。ここまで信用創造をしているのかと驚きます。そりゃ昨年来RRRの低減とかの緩和策を連発してますが、効果が無いのももっともです。これまでの緩和の規模からすると昨年のこの手の緩和はその規模が全く足りないですね。一年以上前にZeroHedgeで中国企業の殆どがミンスキーポイントを超えている、企業の営業利益で債務金利が賄えず利払いのために新たな借金をしている、というのが詳しくデータで示されていましたが、なるほどなと思います。 The Black Swan So Ugly No One Will Talk About It by Phoenix Capita… Fri, 01/11/2019 - 11:55 The biggest black swan facing the financial system is China. 金融システムが直面する最大のブラックスワンは中国だ。 China has been the primary driver of growth for the global economy since the 2008 Crisis...
最後の２段落だけ訳をいれました。 Big Silver-Stock Potential Adam Hamilton February 7, 2020 2689 Words The silver miners’ stocks are looking interesting. While they really lagged silver’s surge on gold’s bull-market-breakout rally last summer, their upleg since remains intact. Gold stocks’ own upleg peaked in early September. And silver itself remains wildly undervalued relative to gold, overdue to mean revert dramatically higher. When that happens during gold’s next upleg, the silver stocks have big potential to soar. Like the global silver market is vastly smaller than gold’s, silver stocks are a proportionally-little fraction of the precious-metals miners. As a small subset of a usually-ignored contrarian sector, the silver stocks often languish in obscurity. For decades there wasn’t even a silver-stock index, making sector analysis difficult. ...
米国はよく理解してませんが、日本の場合では量的緩和で日銀が国債買い上げした資金は日銀当座預金にそのままです、市中には流れていません。でもNHKのニュース等では「ジャブジャブ」という表現をアナウンサーが使い、さらに丁寧に水道の蛇口からお金が吐き出される画像まで示してくれます。これって心理効果が大きいですよね。量的緩和とは何かを７時のニュースや新聞でこれ以上丁寧に解説するのはそう簡単ではありません。一般の人も株式をやっている人も「イメージ」で捉える以上はそう簡単にできません。多くの人は量的緩和とはなにか、を理解していないと私は想像しています。 ただし、国債を買い上げるので長期金利が低下し住宅ローン金利等が下がったのは確実な効果です。一方で長短金利差が少なくなると銀行のビジネスモデルが成り立たなくなりますが。 This Is The One Chart Every Trader Should Have "Taped To Their Screen" by Tyler Durden Sat, 01/19/2019 - 18:55 After a year of tapering, the Fed’s balance sheet finally captured the market’s attention during the last three months of 2018. 一年間のテーパリング後、FEDバランスシートがとうとう市場の注目をあびることになった、２０１８年の最後の３ヶ月だ。 By the start of the fourth quarter, the Fed had finished raising the caps on monthly roll-off of its balance sheet to the full $50bn per month (peaking at $30bn USTs, $20bn MBS...
