Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk,
I just recently spent some time on the Lance Roberts Podcast discussing why the next recession and market downturn will be nothing like the last. Here is the full interview:
私 Mike Shedlock は最近Lance Roverts Podcastで議論した、次の景気後退と市場の下落は前回とは全く違うものになるだろうと言う議論だ。ここで全インタビューを聴取できる:
If you search for "next recession" numerous ideas pop up. Many believe there will not be a recession soon.
Conditions are radically different than in 2007 and 2000. 2007とか2000とは経済環境が全く異なる。
The Fed re-blew a housing price bubble but the number of jobs tied to
construction, sales, CDOs, agents and even the impact on banks is a
shell of what happened then.
Unemployment will not rise much like last time. Instead, expect to
see hours cut.Also expect for many of those currently working two jobs
to lose one of them.
Japan is in a state of zombification and Europe is on the verge.
日本経済はすでにゾンビ化状態であり、欧州もそう変化しつつある。
The US may not and likely will not go through Japanese-like extremes
just yet. However, the demography setup is poor, the student debt
problem is a huge overhang, boomers unprepared for retirement is a huge
overhang, and pensions are a huge overhang.
Amazonで買物をしてContrarianJを応援しよう Albert Edwards: This Was The Final Recessionary Shoe, And It Has Now Fallen by Tyler Durden Thu, 06/27/2019 - 12:45 Exactly three months ago, in late March, the 3 month-10 year spread inverted for the first time since 2007... ちょうど3か月前の3月遅くのことだ、3M10Yスプレッドが2007年以来初めて反転した・・・・ ... an event which sparked near-panic in the market as historically curve inversion has preceded the last 7 recessions. ・・・市場は準混乱状態になった、というのも歴史的に見てイールドカーブ反転が過去7回の景気後退の前兆となっているからだ。 However, while the inversion was certainly a memorable event, the question on everyone's lips is how do risk assets perform once the curve flattens and/or inverts. According to backtests from Goldman, since the mid-1980s, significant stock drawdowns (i.e. market crashes) began only when term slope started steepening after being inverted. ...
今の地球地球温暖化モデルはどれも地球が受ける太陽エネルギーが一定と仮定しています。たとえスーパーコンピュータを利用しようともモデルを超えた計算はできません。しかし太陽の輻射エネルギーは時間とともに変動していますし、太陽と地球の距離は他の惑星の影響で変動、摂動しているのです。過去の温暖化寒冷化はこの摂動でとてもよく説明できます。月の明かりの変化を引き起こすスーパームーン現象も他の惑星の摂動効果による地球・月間距離変動によるものです。こちらはテレビでも解説するのに太陽・地球間距離の摂動変化は決してテレビで解説されることがありません。 いまテレビを賑わしているあの女の子もちゃんと学校に言って科学を勉強すれば自らの愚かさを理解するでしょうに。 Martin Armstrong: The First Clean Air Act Was In 535AD by Tyler Durden Sat, 09/28/2019 - 12:30 Authored by Martin Armstrong via ArmstrongEconomics.com, To me, all this propaganda that humans are responsible for climate change implies that somehow the climate is static and would not be changing but for human activity. This may make great headlines and inspire youth to create strikes and march upon the institutions of capitalism demanding their closure. However, any unbiased review of history reveals a shocking fact – the climate has...